America

America

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

From the Archives: A Nation of Wimps.

From 2004
========
A Nation Of Wimps

Author: Hara Estroff Marano Source: Psychology Today

Title: A NATION OF WIMPS
http://www.witchvox.com/wren/wn_detaila.html?id=11725

Maybe it's the cyclist in the park, trim under his sleek metallic blue helmet, cruising along th dirt path...at three mile an hour. On his tricycle

Or perhaps it's today's playground, all-rubber-cushioned surface where kids used to skin their knees. And...wait a minute...those aren't little kids playing. Their mommies--and especially their daddies--are in there with them, coplaying or play-by-play coaching. Few take it half-easy on the perimeter benches, as parents used to do, letting the kids figure things out for themselves.

Then there are the sanitizing gels, with which over a third of parents now send their kids to school, according to a recent survey. Presumably, parents now worry that school bathrooms are not good enough for their children.

Behold the wholly sanitized childhood, without skinned knees or the occasional C in history. "Kids need to feel badly sometimes," says child psychologist David Elkind, professor at Tufts University. "We learn through experience and we learn through bad experiences. Through failure we learn how to cope."

Messing up, however, even in the playground, is wildly out of style. Although error and experimentation are the true mothers of success, parents are taking pains to remove failure from the equation.

Submitted by and Thanks to: The good folks at Arts and Letters Daily (http://www.aldaily.com/)

[Read Full Story]

==================

When I was in school, I always heard about "the curve", and "blowing the curve". When I hit a snag, I had the "Needs Improvement" in red ink....my nephew gets 'feel-good' babble on his.

Growing up, my playground had huge slides, monkey bars, and a ton of swing sets.
Today, that same playground has 1 swing set with 'safety' seats, no slides, no monkey bars...but it does have a little 'play area'. Most of it is now a grassy field.

We now have helmet laws for bikes. My mother this last summer gave me the big lecture on how I need one. I'm 34. I've done the 'stuntman' bit so often, the old ECW guys are amazed. I've had at least 1 car-involvement accident. Never wore helmet, gloves, pads, etc. I'm still here.

I think sometimes, we worry too much. Yes, stuff can happen, but should we all walk around in armour 24/7 just in case? I'm reading a cook book, and there was a warning in there to wear safety glasses. Y'know, I've never seen anyone on any cooking show wearing em. Never seen them on Iron Chef. Not on Emeril, Mario or Alton. In 20 years of cooking, I've gotten hot oil once, on the eye. That was a few days ago. Is it risky? Yup. But no more than walking down the street, IMO.

Kids are too sheltered, too managed, to controled today. They need the room to make mistakes, to get hurt, to learn. Shelter them too much, and too long, and they will be eaten alive by the world. Is it any wonder kids are fatter today than before? The 30 minute scheduled play period isn't enough to burn it off...they want to run around, we call it ADD and drug them. If they act 'different', we tag them with a different name and start 'behavioral modification therapy'. 5 yr old makes a finger gun, goes 'bang bang', and gts a month off for violating the schools 'zero weapons' policy. 6 year old smooches a class mate, and is removed for class for 'sexual harassment'.

You know, if I was in school today, they'd have me executed fast. I used to play guns all the time...I used to kiss the girls and make em cry....I used to play DnD....oh my gawd! I even listened to heavy metal and wore a trench coat.

I truely feel for the kids today...I really do.

=====

It just seems to me, that everything is getting so sanitized, and structured, that the 'spontaneity' and 'randomness' of youth is being lost. We as adults do the getup, goto work, work, come home, dinner, take the kids to their event (classes, games, shows, etc), come home, and pass out "dance" 5 days a week. Part of being a kid is just 'doing', randomly, wandering and exploring. I think it's missing for too many kids today.

The predators are a problem, I admit. It seems like every time you turn on the tv or read the paper that there's another one out there. This priest, that teacher, this neighbor, that relative, that friend, that politician, etc. Who is there that you can trust? All you can do, is what you can do, and hope and pray that it is enough. A key point however, is to do that protecting without seriously impacting the child's ability to interact with others. I think that means that as time goes on, you must relax the restraint.

Sometimes, you can go too far. A person I know, 24, still lives at home, still has a curfew, has never had a 'sleepover', must check in regularly when out, all friends must be 'approved' by the mother, etc. She's a nice gal, but completely incapable of being on her own, without the maternal management. I knew a couple that got married to escape controlling parents...they've been evicted twice, apartments totally pigsties...they haven't got a clue when it comes to 'housework'. Mommy did it all for them.

There has to be a point, or series of points where they are allowed to "grow up".

[Read the full archived discussion at MartialTalk]

New York governor to propose legalizing same-sex marriage

New York governor to propose legalizing same-sex marriage

  • Story Highlights
  • Assemblyman says governor's office asked him to attend announcement of bill
  • Previous governor filed same bill, which passed Assembly but not Senate
  • Gov. Paterson has said he is committed to "full marriage equality in New York State"
  • "We hope to have this bill passed at the end of June," assemblyman says
If the legislation passes, it would make New York the fifth state to legalize same sex-marriage. Similar measures have been approved by courts or lawmakers in Connecticut, Vermont, Massachusetts and Iowa.

=====

It would be nice to see NY do the right thing here, and give people a reason to come here, rather than leave for a change.

Do you really own your car?

Do you really own your car? (Originally posted at MartialTalk 11-07-2008)

Found something interesting.

I've always thought that I owned my cars. Seems that I was wrong.

I bought em, and eventually got a "Certificate of Title" from the state.

I'm now reading that this "Certificate of Title" only lets me operate the car, not actually own it.

Here's a bits on it.
Quote:
The certificate of title is a piece of paper that only represents the title of the car. Each car that is manufactured has an MCO, or “manufacturer’s certificate of origin,” that is the true title for the car. Because most cars are purchased on a payment plan, the dealer sends the MCO to the state agency that controls the registration of vehicles. The MCO is microfilmed and then shredded to make it much more difficult for you to obtain the actual title.
Supposedly, this MSO or “manufacturer’s certificate of origin” is the true title to the vehicle. You don't get that, the state does.

Quote:
you dont OWN your car if you live in the U.S A. you own the RIGHT to posess and drive it you pay for that right each and every year above and beyond the purchase price the MSO you seek is purposely not issued and even if it is you will have to surrender it to the state in which you register the vehicle in essence GIVING UP ownership to the state
A rather LONG! read of 8 months worth or exchanges between someone and the Missouri Department of Revenue Motor Vehicle Bureau on this matter seems to indicate that you do not need to register, license, etc your car until you apply for a title and surrender the MSO to the state.

A shorter bit is at http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/consp...ps/titles.html
Quote:
Tennessee Department of Revenue Operations Supervisor, Denise Rottero, told Judge Greer how Tennessee's (and EVERY OTHER STATE'S) auto registration process works.

The process begins with the "surrender" of the Manufacturer's Statement of Origin (MSO) by the auto dealer to the Department of Revenue in exchange for a Certificate of Title. Asked if a Manufacturer's Statement of Origin is proof of ownership, legal title to the automobile, Ms. Rottero said, "Yes".

"Are you telling me that ownership of an automobile must be surrendered to the State before it can be registered?" she was asked. "Surrender title, yes'" Rottero said. The certificate of title to your automobile is NOT title, it's merely evidence that title exists. Your car's legal TITLE is the MSO, which the dealer surrendered to the State. Ms. Rottero said the MSO is put on microfilm for permanent keeping, the original is destroyed. After the trial, spectators expressed shock that their personal automobiles were actually owned by the state.

I'm finding more on this, but curious on what others think.

What do you mean "We don't know what the Founding Fathers meant?"

Whenever an argument involving the Constitution comes up, someone will often comment that we don't know for certain what they authors intended, or that "that was then, this is now and it's different.".

I question the intelligence of anyone making those types of statements. Firstly, to me, the Constitution is pretty straight forward. It's a short read, it's in rather simple English, and one doesn't need to have 4 years of law school to follow it.

In short, this was a document written for the people.

Not the lawyers or politicians who like to phrase things in muddy, vague manners.

We also know what the authors were thinking when they wrote this. See, they also wrote to each other, and published their letters in the news papers of the day. Many of these letters are available to us in the Federalist Papers, and the Anti Federalist Papers.

Others are available on line, and in published collections of our Founding Fathers works, all available through your favorite book seller.

So, we know what they were thinking.

So, the only reasons to say you don't is because you're either trying to deceive or because you can't understand. Either way, I'm not sure I want that person speaking for me.

I'll stick with these guys:

"On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823. ME 15:449 [link]
Thomas Jefferson (1743 – 1826): Third President of the United States (1801–1809), the principal author of the Declaration of Independence (1776), and Founding Father

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
Daniel Webster: US diplomat, lawyer, orator, & politician (1782 - 1852)

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
Samuel Adams: During Massachusetts' U.S. Constitution Ratification Convention, (1788.)
[link]
Samuel Adams (1722 –1803) statesman, political philosopher, and Founding Father

Monday, April 13, 2009

America's Forgotten Presidents.

America's Forgotten Presidents. (Originally posted at MartialTalk 11-08-2008)

Who was the First President of the United States?

If you answered "Duh. Everyone knows it was George Washington" you'd be wrong.

George Washington was not the first, but somewhere between the 9th and 20th man to hold the title.

Prior to the ratification of the US Constitution, the US was operating under the Articles of Confederation. (Side note, this included an offer to Canada to join us in our fun nation building experiment).

Prior to the AoC, there were 2 Continental Congresses.

Here (thanks to Wiki Magic) is the list of America's Forgotten Presidents.

List of presidents

The following men served as the president of the First Continental Congress:
The following men served as the president of the Second Continental Congress:
When the Articles of Confederation were ratified on March 1, 1781, no elections were held or even discussed for a selecting a new president.[4] Instead, Samuel Huntington continued to serve as President of Congress until he asked to be relieved due to ill health on July 6, 1781.[4] On July 9, Samuel Johnston was selected as Huntington's replacement, but he declined the office the next day, and so Thomas McKean was elected as the next presiding officer.[4]
The following men served as President of Congress after the ratification of the Articles of Confederation:

These men while holding a similar title, held none of the power and authority that began with Washington, and has grown to what we have today.


Just a little American Trivia to start your day with.
Copyright © 2009 Bob Hubbard. All rights reserved.