America

America
Showing posts with label jefferson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jefferson. Show all posts

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Vote an Incumbant Out Campaign 2010



From MartialTalk-Posted by celtic_crippler 11-18-2009
============
Vote an Incumbant Out Campaign 2010

I just heard an announcement about Senator Robert Byrd setting a record just 2 days before his 92nd birthday for serving 57 years in Congress...

57 f'n years!?!?! REALLY?!?!?!

He's served since the Eisenhower administration.

What the hell does this guy have in common with any of you? How can somebody "represent" you, when they can't relate to "you" or your every day problems?

I remember Senator Strom Thurmond once refer to a microphone as a "machine"...

Anyway, our government is full of out-of-touch incumbants that have LONG out-served their usefullness. These bloated parasites have fed off our successes and contributed to our problems for too long.

Why vote them in again? They've had over 1/2 century to screw our country up, and as evidenced by today's environment have done a pretty good job of it too.

"We" share the blame for becoming apathetic and complacent, allowing them to return to office over, and over, and over... so we must STOP.

"We" all know that we can not trust nor count on our current representation to do anything other than pushing us further over the edge.

"We" have to start making changes, real ones, somewhere and there's no better place than at the polls.

"We" know there's no real change on the horizon if "we" trust our county's leadership to bring it about. "We" must do that ourselves... so...

Vote an Incumbant OUT in 2010.

Send a definate message to all that remain that we're mad as hell, and we're not gonna take it any more. You screw up, and do a horrible job and we'll fire your sorry butt!

Spread the word! Vote them OUT! We need fresh perspectives and ideas.

Monday, March 15, 2010

What I believe



What I believe

A statement of facts on positions taken.


Through out years of debate comments have been made that misstate, misinterpret or misunderstand my views and positions. This is an attempt to set the record straight. Do not expect to find solutions to stated issues as this is not a solution statement, but a belief statement.


Taxes.
Taxes are a fee accessed by a government on various activities. Without taxes government is incapable of functioning. Tariffs are a form of tax. My view is that business oriented taxes such as taxes on sales of items, as well as importation fees are acceptable as part of the responsibility of members of a higher society. These are optional "dues" if you will and I can opt out by not purchasing those items. I object to taxes on property and income and associate them to theft at gun point for if you refuse to hand them over you suffer. I am non-committed on such things as school taxes. While I recognize the need to fund education, it seems unfair that people without children are forced to pay, however that is balanced by the idea that they may have benefited from the same public education so I can see it as your parents paid some for you and you pay some for you and yours. Registration and Licensing fees are simply an income stream for government and I'm against those. While I am against certain things, unlike some I pay my fair share regardless. I do it because it is the law, but I do so under objection.

Voting
I believe it is the duty of every citizen to educate themselves on the issues and make an informed decision at the voting booth. I believe that if you didn't vote, you don't have the right to complain as you chose to accept whatever result by your inaction. I believe that the duty of the citizen is to elect educated individuals who will do what is right for the people, and be open to listening to the people. I believe it is wrong to vote on party lines, or for the lesser of evils, but that you should vote for the candidate who represents you best. Not the one most likely to win. I believe voting should be mandatory, even if all the person does is show up and check the "refused" box.

Role of Federal Government.
I believe in a strict interpretation of the US Constitution, similar to that of President Jefferson's. I believe the Federal government should not be involved in the day to day lives of the people, that it should be greatly downsized back into part time status. I believe that it should do little more than guard the borders and deliver the mail.

Role of Local Government.
I believe the State to be the dominant government level, with a strict belief in States Rights as put forth through the US Constitution. The good of the State, not the Nation is key. Social services if any should work from this level, not the Federal.

Social Services.
I do not believe in them. Given the 60%+ fraud rate I believe the existing systems should be scrapped and a new one that actively fights fraud instituted. Too much money is wasted on overhead and corruption resulting in those most in need not receiving what they could. This is wrong. I do not believe in welfare, but workfare. A system where unemployed are put to work in exchange for a warm bed and square meals and some cash is better than handing someone a debit card of other people money. I have refused to accept government money for gas, electric or food despite at times qualifying for it. I accepted a state issued voluntary health insurance plan as I am a tax payer and it helped. If it was not available, I would have funded my care out of pocket as needed through shopping around for the best affordable care as I did before.

Health Reform.
The current system does little but drive prices up, while diluting quality of service. A new system that resolves the problem of high prices, high cost to taxpayers and increasing need for services in a fiscally responsible and humane manner needs to be created. I believe this is possible. I believe we can provide the best quality health care to the poor and lower income levels without putting people out of work, creating shortages or bankrupting the nation. I believe it is crucial that people realize that, that Congress consider it, and that to do neither is criminal.

Direction of country
I do not believe the nation is heading in the right direction, but is instead as a ship locked on course for the rocks. The government has become deaf, and refuses to listen to the people. Instead they pass unreadable and often unread bills in the tens of thousands of pages, robbing from the people to fund feel good projects that only shore p future campaign contributions for themselves. I do not believe the United States should be involved in waging foreign wars, aiding other nations especially the ones who hate us, or acting as World Policeman. I believe it's time to come home, bring our troops back, and fortify our own borders against the enemy. I believe rather than building new homes in Iraq that we should be building those homes here, for our people.

Gay Marriage / Marriage
I believe than any 2 adults who are of sound mind who wish to commit, should be allowed to. I believe that short of a Constitutional amendment however the Federal government should stay out of the marriage defining business. States can make their own laws, however they need to recognize their obligations under the US Constitution and I believe the USSC needs to remind them of that fact. I believe that any group of like minded adults who wish to enter a partnership should be allowed to do so, with rights and responsibilities. I don't believe the Federal government should decide that matter however.

Police Misbehavior
I believe that the majority of cops are honest, hard working individuals who do an often thankless job and see the worst of people too often. Those who violate their oaths and disgrace their uniforms should be prosecuted and punished under the law without exception.

The Concept and Institute of "Slavery"
I am opposed to the concept of slavery. I believe to hold people in bondage is wrong. I also believe however that some people are incapable of handling freedom and are better kept as slaves. Most enter this state willingly and become slaves to addictions, or give control over to others freely. I pity them and believe that only by education and love can they eventually be freed. Regarding the system as practiced in the United States prior to it's end under President Johnson in December 1865 I find that system abhorrent and deserving of end. I believe however that such an end could have come peacefully without the illusion of a war fought over it.

US Civil War
I believe that war was illegal, that under the law and the Constitution that States can exit the Union as they entered it, in peace, by vote. That the difference between a rebellion and a secession is that a rebellion seeks to over throw the government, while the succeeding states wanted to be left along and NOT change the Federal government by force of arms. I believe that those who state the war was a forgone conclusion from the start are correct. I believe that the popular myth of the war being fought over slavery to be a discredit to history and fact, and that the lead up and reasons are much more complicated than those presented in popular official history. I believe that as more facts emerge that the views will change.

American Dream
I believe in this. That through hard work, good character and providing value in service that one can get ahead and win the game. I believe that one can work for themselves and get ahead. I believe that there is plenty of wealth available, that we live in a world of abundance, that it is ours for the asking, if we simply do what we have to do to obtain it. I believe you can have everything you ask for in life, if you just help enough other people get there too. I do not believe there is a vast conspiracy to keep me poor, that the deck is stacked against me, that I cannot win.

Responsibility
I believe one must accept the responsibility for their actions and non actions. I do not believe I am responsible for anyone else, unless I accept that responsibility (ie kids, pets, marriage, be an employer) You made the decisions that brought you to where ever it is you are. You should accept that fact, then make more decisions to change that place if it's not acceptable to you. Life is a journey through the unknown, you picked and planned the route, even if that plan was to wander aimlessly around. Accept responsibility for that, and change your plan if you do not like where it got you.

Respect
Respect is earned, not freely given. All beings deserve the opportunity for basic respect, however not all beings keep it. I will hold a door open, but do not make me wait forever while you gab. Respect at it's basics is courtesy. Respect is not free handouts, free food and free housing.

Winning the Game
I believe that people rise or sink on their efforts, merits and self images. That one strong in all three will rise farther than one lacking all three. I do not believe that one lacking ambition, drive, determination and dedication should be given a hand out or a boost above those who have them. I believe that those who do have them, deserve to keep what they earn and do with the fruits of their labors as they see fit. I do not believe that if I grow 2 apples and you have none that I should be forced to give you any apples.

Differences of Opinion/Fact
I respect others difference of opinion or fact in controversial matters. Everyone has the right to disagree with me. I have more respect for those who can validate their positions with fact. I am open to changing my positions and views based on new facts and information. My position is rarely solidly fixed, but will evolve over time based on the input and advice of others and the influx of new data from reputable sources.


This has been a statement of belief. An absence of citation, lack of solution or even a proposed solution does not negate nor validate any comment. If you wish to change my mind on these matters you must first open yours to change as well. I reserve the right to change my mind at a later date, and I warn that this list while a list is far from a complete one, that any omission should not indicate I do not have a belief in a particular matter, nor should it indicate I do.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Random Quotes on Taxation



Random Quotes on Taxation

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents... -- James Madison

When there's a single thief, it's robbery. When there are a thousand thieves, it's taxation. -- Vanya Cohen

A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money. -- G. Gordon Liddy

America is a land of taxation that was founded to avoid taxation. -- Dr. Laurence J. Peter

Worried about an IRS audit? Avoid what's called a red flag. That's something the IRS always looks for. For example, say you have some money left in your bank account after paying taxes. That's a red flag. -- Jay Leno

We don't have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven't taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. - Ronald Reagan

Intaxication: Euphoria at getting a refund from the IRS, which lasts until you realize it was your money to start with. ~Author unknown, from a Washington Post word contest

You don't pay taxes - they take taxes. ~Chris Rock, Bigger and Blacker

The federal government was NEVER supposed to provide all the social services that have essentially bankrupted the nation. Just ask James Madison. - Bob Hubbard
"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare,
and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare,
they may take the care of religion into their own hands;
they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
and pay them out of their public treasury;... Read More
they may take into their own hands the education of children,
establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union;
they may assume the provision of the poor;
they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads;
in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation
down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power
of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for,
it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature
of the limited Government established by the people of America."

by:

James Madison
(1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President
Source:

referring to a bill to subsidize cod fisherman introduced in the first year of the new Congress

The politicians say "we" can't afford a tax cut. Maybe we can't afford the politicians. ~Steve Forbes

Question: " I understand that Congress is considering a so-called 'flat' tax system. How would this work?"

Answer: "If Congress were to pass a 'flat' tax, you'd simply pay a fixed percentage of your income, and you wouldn't have to fill out any complicated forms, and there would be no loopholes for politically connected groups, and normal people would actually understand the tax laws, and giant talking broccoli stalks would come around and mow your lawn for free, because Congress is NOT going to pass a flat tax, you pathetic fool." ~Dave Barry

The flat tax would be so simple, you could fill it out on a post card. A post card that would say, in effect, having a wonderful time; glad most of my money is here. ~Steve Forbes

U.S. Internal Revenue Service: an agency modeled after the revenue raising concepts of the 19th century economist, Jesse James. ~Robert Brault,

The government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. ~Ronald Reagan

To force a man to pay for the violation of his own liberty is indeed an addition of insult to injury. ~Benjamin Tucker, Instead of a Book

Of course the truth is that the congresspersons are too busy raising campaign money to read the laws they pass. The laws are written by staff tax nerds who can put pretty much any wording they want in there. I bet that if you actually read the entire vastness of the U.S. Tax Code, you'd find at least one sex scene ("'Yes, yes, YES!' moaned Vanessa as Lance, his taut body moist with moisture, again and again depreciated her adjusted gross rate of annualized fiscal debenture"). ~Dave Barry

What at first was plunder assumed the softer name of revenue. ~Thomas Paine

America is a land of taxation that was founded to avoid taxation. ~Laurence J. Peter

That which we obtain too easily, we esteem too lightly. Thomas Paine

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Congress's Powers?



Congress's Powers?
"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated." - Thomas Jefferson, 1798

Quote:
Matt BrownThere are only 18 enumerated powers allowed to The federal government under article 1 section 8. "General Welfare" does not mean "Welfare social programs" Nor does article 1 section 8 allow the federal government to regulate intRAstate commerce or do half the things it is unconstitutionally doing. If a power is not found in Article 1 section 8, Then under the 10th amendment, that power belongs to the people and the states. Our federal government has Morphed into a tyranical and unconstitutional acting entity
__________________

Friday, April 24, 2009

Words of Wisdom from the late Harry Browne



Words of Wisdom from the late Harry Browne

Harry Browne - Big Government

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GHEwhdYs5U

Former Libertarian presidential candidate Harry Browne explains the dynamics of big government http://www.libertypen.com


Harry Browne: The Great Libertarian Offer

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWXpObAVdyY

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOe-KKOI4gU

Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUrPDITcHv4

Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqmzSishzwI

Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixwhbmyCrr8
__________________

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Is it 1860 again?



The war that Lincoln began was over many things. Slavery was but 1 part, and we've debated that a lot. Ironically much back in 04/05 when I first posted my articles on secession.

This time around however, slavery is not a factor.

Interestingly enough though, many of the same reasons that launched both the American Revolution and the War of Southern Independence are with us again.

We've buried the lessons of history, we've rewritten tyrants and butchers like Lincoln, Grant, Sherman and Sheridan into heroes, we've allowed the Heirs of Hamilton their dream of a large and powerful Central government, to the detriment of We The People. We proclaim Washington, Madison and Jefferson "outdated" and "not applicable" as out non-representatives in Washington sell out our grandchildren's grandchildren to save their incompetent financial backers from ruin.

More than half the country is starting to wake up, people are taking to the streets, and things are in motion. Their outcome, uncertain. Is a sleeping giant again awakening, to reclaim their country and return us to a path we should never have left, or is this just another false alarm, and will snooze be hit again, as we are further disarmed, subjugated, and made dependent on the hind tit of a decomposing dead carcass painted red, white and blue?

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

United States? Ummm.....I don't think so.



List of states with sovereignty motions in play a of now:
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/...y-resolutions/

  1. Wisconsin
  2. Illinois
  3. West Virginia
  4. North Carolina
  5. North Dakota (passed house 52-40 on 04-07-09) (passed senate 25-20 on 04-20-09 - returned to house, amended)
  6. Ohio
  7. Nevada (Committee 04-11-09: “No Further Action Allowed”)
  8. Oregon
  9. Alabama (2nd Resolution, HJR403, introduced 03-24-09)
  10. Mississippi (senate resolution introduced 03-10-09)
  11. Pennsylvania (senate resolution introduced 03-19-09)
  12. Idaho (Passed House 51-17, on 03-23-09, Passed Senate on 04-07-09)
  13. New Mexico (tabled in committee)
  14. South Dakota (passed house on 03-03-09 by a vote of 51-18, passed senate on 03-05-09 by a vote of 20-14)
  15. Virginia
  16. Kentucky (2nd resolution introduced on 02/24)
  17. Alaska (2nd resolution introduced 03-19-09) (HJR27 Passed 37-0 on 04-06-09) (Senate Passed HJR27, 19-0, on 04-19-09 - Awaiting Transmittal to Governor)
  18. Indiana (2nd Senate Resolution Introduced 03-19-09) (SR0042 Passed Committe 8-0 on 04-01-09) (SR0042 Passed Senate 44-3 on 04-09-09)
  19. Tennessee
  20. Arkansas (failed in committee on 03-04-09 passed committee 04-01-09
  21. Minnesota
  22. South Carolina (passed house on 02-26-09, senate - referred to subcommittee)
  23. Georgia (Senate Version - Passed 43-1 on 04/01/09)
  24. Kansas
  25. Texas (senate resolution introduced 03-02-09 - senate’s 2nd resolution introduced on 03-04-09)
  26. New Hampshire (resolution killed in house on 03-04-09: 216-150)
  27. Missouri
  28. Iowa
  29. Montana (Failed 51-49 on 02-24-09) (Resolution reintroduced as HR3) (HR3 Passed House Committee on 04-21-09)
  30. Michigan (senate version introduced 03-03-09)
  31. Arizona
  32. Washington
  33. Oklahoma (passed house on 02/18/09, senate version passed 25-17 on 03-04-09) (Joint version passed Senate, 29-18 on 04-15-09 - awaiting signuture of governor) Failed House vote, 54-34)
Sounds like "We The People" are waking up an deciding that an out of control and out of touch "Elite" needs a reminder on the Constitution and the real limits to their powers. About fucking time America.
About. Fucking. Time.

Can Texas Really Secede?



Can Texas Really Secede?

That's the question floating around now that Texas Gov.

Neither the US Constitution nor the Texas Constitution specifically mention any way to separate.

The Texas Constitution says this about Texas and the US.

ARTICLE 1. BILL OF RIGHTS Sec. 1. FREEDOM AND SOVEREIGNTY OF STATE. Texas is a free and independent State, subject only to the Constitution of the United States, and the maintenance of our free institutions and the perpetuity of the Union depend upon the preservation of the right of local self-government, unimpaired to all the States.

This would seem to indicate that Texas consideres itself a partner with the United States, not a subservient section of it.

Now, we've established in the past (see below) that secession is legal despite the outcome of Mr. Lincoln's Illegal War and the forced at gunpoint readmission of the states that supposedly never left (How do you reenter end you never left?).

So, my take on this matter is, if Texas decides to secede, it will. A motion will possibly go to the state government, be passed onto the people to decide, and the "Will of the People" followed. Of course, there are economic, political and social matters to consider. This isn't something to do lightly, nor quickly. Care must be used, and if a division occurs, it should be peaceful, to maintain good relations between the 2. Both sides must be aware that we have enemies who will use such an event to their advantage, and our disadvantage. In the eyes of many, even if we divide, we are all the same to them.

Personally, I'd prefer to see a motion to consider the option put forth on this years ballot, so that the public's opinion could be weighed. A large number calling for consideration could carry as much weight if not more that actually doing it, and accomplish much of the same goals, while not rushing into something hastily.



Here's some related links.
The idea of Secession.
Chuck Norris Talks Secession (not recession)
Revisiting the Past : Part 1 - An examination of the concept of Secession
Revisiting the Past : Part 2 - The Road to War : Causes
Revisiting the Past : Part 3 - An re-examination of the concept of Secession
Revisiting the Past : Pt 4 - The Institution of Slavery, cause for war. - Bob Hubbard

Monday, April 20, 2009

You have Rights; the Government has Privileges - Michael Badnarik



You have Rights; the Government has Privileges - Michael Badnarik 1/3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qc4PbRQtwz0


You have Rights; the Government has Privileges - Michael Badnarik 2/3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bDlVoElbd8

You have Rights; the Government has Privileges - Michael Badnarik 3/3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFZB_Vwmto0

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Friday, April 17, 2009

Thomas Paine on to Washington




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=le2OnDKqj3g

More Stupid Comments by Dumb People.

Don't these guys know, we can't be trusted with weapons? That only special people, with special permission, and nice pressed uniforms, or dirty stained flannel shirts should have them? Sheesh.

=====

If I were to select a jack-booted group of fascists who are perhaps as large a danger to American society as I could pick today, I would pick BATF [the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms].
-- U.S. Representative John Dingell, 1980

.. a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen...
-- Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App.181)

The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.
-- Report of the Subcommittee On The Constitution of the Committee On
The Judiciary, United States Senate, 97th Congress, second session
(February, 1982), SuDoc# Y4.J 89/2: Ar 5/5

In recent years it has been suggested that the Second Amendment protects the "collective" right of states to maintain militias, while it does not protect the right of "the people" to keep and bear arms. If anyone entertained this notion in the period during which the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were debated and ratified, it remains one of the most closely guarded secrets of the eighteenth century, for no known writing surviving from the period between 1787 and 1791 states such a thesis.
-- Stephen P. Halbrook, "That Every Man Be Armed", 1984

To make inexpensive guns impossible to get is to say that you're putting a money test on getting a gun. It's racism in its worst form.
-- Roy Innis, president of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), 1988

I don't like the idea that the police department seems bent on kepping a pool of unarmed victims available for the predations of the criminal class.
-- David Mohler, 1989, on being denied a carry permit in NYC

Americans have the will to resist because you have weapons. If you don't have a gun, freedom of speech has no power.
-- Yoshimi Ishikawa, Japanese author, in the LA Times 15 Oct 1992

You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one.
-- Rush Limbaugh, in a moment of unaccustomed profundity 17 Aug 1993

Thursday, April 16, 2009

We The People Stimulus Package




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA

Texas continues to hint Secession.



Texas continues to hint Secession.

Recently martial arts expert and actor Chuck Norris said in a few interviews that he's willing to take up the mantle as President of the Republic of Texas, should Texas decide it's had enough of Washington's continued defecating on the US Constitution and leave.

On April 15th, Texas Gov. Rick Perry suggested Texans might at some point get so fed up they would want to secede from the union.

"There's a lot of different scenarios," Perry said. "We've got a great union. There's absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, you know, who knows what might come out of that. But Texas is a very unique place, and we're a pretty independent lot to boot."

When Texas entered the union in 1845 there was an understanding it could pull out at a later time if it decided to. However when it did secede in 1861, is was forced back into the Union by force of arms. Currently, according to the Texas State Library and Archives Commission, Texas negotiated the power to divide into four additional states at some point if it wanted to but not the right to secede.

The debate over the legality of secession has been ongoing as nothing within the US Constitution specifically states that a member State can not do this, indicating it is a valid option.

Texas has a history of being a very independent and freedom loving place. Concerns over the US Economy, the continued mortgaging of our future to bail out failing businesses and saddling taxpayers with mounting debt, as well as serious concern over Federal abuse of the Second Amendment and rumors of mandatory gun registration and confiscation, are pushing the people of Texas towards a hard choice.

If it happens, I doubt it will be a peaceful exit.

"Its a different world today" is a common comment.



"Its a different world today" is a common comment.
Yep. It is, which is why they allowed for the ability to amend the constitution, yet made it difficult, so it wasn't done at whim without careful discussion and consideration. The Constitution consists of three parts: the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the subsequent Amendments. This was the framework designed to run and restrict our Federal government. Unfortunately, a number of people claim it's outdated, vague, or allows greater power than stated because it doesn't specifically say "no". Others claim we don't know what they said, even though they left huge amounts of writing clearly stating most if not all the points.

Unfortunately, too many people who take oaths to "Uphold and Defend" the Constitution, choose to reinterpret things their way, and excuse violation when it's convenient or doesn't favor their own views.
Freedom of Speech doesn't mean just what you want to hear. It also means the vilest, foulest, most offensive imaginable.

Madison's original draft of the Bill of Rights contained two proposed amendments dealing with freedom of speech. One proposed amendment said "The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable."

Freedom of Religion doesn't mean just your faith, and the ones you accept. It means the rock worshipers, the sky dancers, the polytheists, the no-theists, and those people over there doing the weird stuff.

"Among the most inestimable of our blessings, also, is that... of liberty to worship our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; a liberty deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and yet proved by our experience to be its best support." --Thomas Jefferson: Reply to John Thomas et al., 1807. ME 16:291


Right to Bear Arms means that every freeman had the right AND responsibility to own, train with, be experienced with, and understand arms. Arms isn't just a .22. It's a machine gun, it's an RPG, it's an M60, its an MP5.


"The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them." -- Zacharia Johnson, delegate to Virginia Ratifying Convention, Elliot, 3:645-6


And so on.
Unfortunately, today we have a government that continually usurps more and more power, seeks to disarm it's citizens, to criminalize dissent, to create dependence, so that like children we are forever glued to the tit of government. Sheep, here but to be serfs under the illusion of free will. So yes, it is a different world. One which our Founders would be ashamed of, and disgusted that we have let it fall so far from what they created for us.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

These guys had no idea how stupid we are.



These guys didn't know what they were talking about. We need special people to let us know what we can and can't be trusted with, and they need to keep track of that for us as we're too untrustworthy and stupid to handle ourselves otherwise. So stupid they were back then.

=====


When only cops have guns, it's called a "police state".

Love your country, but never trust its government.
-- Robert A. Heinlein.


"The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good"
-- George Washington

"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."
-- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188


"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it."
-- Abraham Lincoln, 4 April 1861

"One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms."
-- Constitutional scholar Joseph Story, 1840

Men trained in arms from their infancy, and animated by the love of liberty, will afford neither a cheap or easy conquest.
-- From the Declaration of the Continental Congress, July 1775.

"As to the species of exercise, I advise the gun. While this gives [only] moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun, therefore, be the constant companion to your walks."
-- Thomas Jefferson, writing to his teenaged nephew.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
-- 16 Am. Jur. Sec. 177 late 2d, Sec 256


"Taking my gun away because I might shoot someone is like cutting my tongue out because I might yell `Fire!' in a crowded theater."
-- Peter Venetoklis

...Virtually never are murderers the ordinary, law-abiding people against whom gun bans are aimed. Almost without exception, murderers are extreme aberrants with lifelong histories of crime, substance abuse, psychopathology, mental retardation and/or irrational violence against those around them, as well as other hazardous behavior, e.g., automobile and gun accidents."
-- Don B. Kates, writing on statistical patterns in gun crime

"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."
-- John F. Kennedy

he right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
-- Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story of the John Marshall Court

False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria, as quoted by Thomas Jefferson's Commonplace book

No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave.
-- "Political Disquisitions", a British republican tract of 1774-1775

Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defence? Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defence be the *real* object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
-- Patrick Henry, speech of June 9 1788

"To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
-- George Mason, speech of June 14, 1788

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the great struggle for independence.
-- Attributed to Charles Austin Beard (1874-1948)

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Should the U.S. move the battle against pirates to shore?

CNN is asking "Should the U.S. move the battle against pirates to shore?"

I say yes.

It was due to the actions of one group of pirates that the US Navy and US Marine Corp were created in 1794. Taking the fight against the Somali pirates would be a worthy action for both forces today, provided they are allowed to engage and destroy the pirates, and not handcuffed by politicians.

Piracy is glamorous when it's Johnny Depp. Reality, is far uglier.

What do you mean "We don't know what the Founding Fathers meant?"

Whenever an argument involving the Constitution comes up, someone will often comment that we don't know for certain what they authors intended, or that "that was then, this is now and it's different.".

I question the intelligence of anyone making those types of statements. Firstly, to me, the Constitution is pretty straight forward. It's a short read, it's in rather simple English, and one doesn't need to have 4 years of law school to follow it.

In short, this was a document written for the people.

Not the lawyers or politicians who like to phrase things in muddy, vague manners.

We also know what the authors were thinking when they wrote this. See, they also wrote to each other, and published their letters in the news papers of the day. Many of these letters are available to us in the Federalist Papers, and the Anti Federalist Papers.

Others are available on line, and in published collections of our Founding Fathers works, all available through your favorite book seller.

So, we know what they were thinking.

So, the only reasons to say you don't is because you're either trying to deceive or because you can't understand. Either way, I'm not sure I want that person speaking for me.

I'll stick with these guys:

"On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823. ME 15:449 [link]
Thomas Jefferson (1743 – 1826): Third President of the United States (1801–1809), the principal author of the Declaration of Independence (1776), and Founding Father

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
Daniel Webster: US diplomat, lawyer, orator, & politician (1782 - 1852)

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
Samuel Adams: During Massachusetts' U.S. Constitution Ratification Convention, (1788.)
[link]
Samuel Adams (1722 –1803) statesman, political philosopher, and Founding Father
Copyright © 2009 Bob Hubbard. All rights reserved.